Therefore, I will upload it to my friend account. I really sorry.
2013051611
Seon yong il
The report begins with the most fundamental question. “What Is Globalization?” This word is easy to approach, but it is too difficult to explain. Of course, it is easy to cite examples such as Coca-Cola and McDonald's.
The biggest characteristic of globalization is that it is both general and concrete at the same time. That is why it is difficult to explain globalization. Globalization is simply not going to happen in a single direction. It can only be complicated because countries all over the world have to agree to agree to consensus. For example, developing countries and developed countries are different. There are many differences, including income levels, values, and lifestyle. Based on this, there is a discrepancy in views. This is why the word globalization is interpreted differently in each country.
In social science, ' society ' is a basic unit of life and a large unit. Globalization collides head-on with this concept. That means the meaning of globalization means that the world becomes a group. The world is definitely too big for a group of people to call a small town called Society. There is also a reason why Socialist scholars can not easily accept globalization.
Globalization simply doesn't count on words. Various regulations are available in terms of politics, economics, society and cultural aspects. And the difference between the meaning of globalization in each field inevitably arises.
Globalization is different from that in the field, but the word itself alone is difficult to define. The reason is that there is no clear standard for the 'Globalization'. It can also be linked to regions that contradict the world. ‘ Globalization ’ and ‘ regional identity ’ are words that are precisely opposite. Globalization is the ‘ enormous ’ word that embraces everything, both equally and compassionately.
It was interesting that the meaning of globalization could be understood differently. Even though it is not the word ‘ globalization ’, there are many different words that are interpreted differently depending on class or gender. A typical example is feminism. Feminism has many different implications within one country. What I want to say is not exactly the definition of feminism. There are so many words translated into various meanings in one country, such as the example of feminism. Globalization is variously interpreted according to rank, gender and knowledge levels within a country. It is needless to say that each country represents two different meanings. We need to pay attention to this point. This is because we can think about it in relation to stereotypes. We define the meaning of most words easily. They don't question the meaning of their own accord, nor refuse to change it. However, we can learn from the experience so far. Conflicts between classes, conflicts between nations, conflict of local communities result in small differences. But it doesn't fix it easily. Why is that?
We can find the answer in the environment where we grew up. One can understand why globalization is interpreted differently. It is very interesting that one word can produce various interpretations.
We can read this passage and discuss the merits of globalization. But that level of equality is likely to suit high school students. I think globalization is going to be inevitable. So, what is the benefit and reality of globalization? Does the advanced nations benefit from the globalization process? Conversely, is the developing world losing money in the process of globalization? Is the complete globalization attainable?
The report revealed that the significance of the full globalization is unclear. The meaning of globalization is to enjoy common sense. For example, if a person in the world is a country, you can see the bathroom image if you look at the bathroom image. This can also be said to be a form of globalization. Let me ask you a question. If you put a fork, spoon or chopsticks into the image to represent the restaurant, would it be an image suitable for globalization? Some people say yes. But I don't think so. Indians use their hands when they eat. In this case, a picture with a spoon and fork can not be said to be the world's only globalized. Should Indians see a picture of a spoon and fork and give them a ' concession '? Or should it be said that a hand-shaped drawing, a spoon, a fork, and a fork should be seen as a restaurant? These are just examples.
But there is no possibility. Eating rice by hand can be said to be the ‘ culture ’ that they have kept. Even though it is not now, they may no longer be able to eat their hands with their hands in the distant future. It may be the reason for the inconvenience of using chopsticks or washing the hands repeatedly. Whatever the reason for the agreement was reached, he approached globalization.
No comments:
Post a Comment