Summarize
Gerard Delanty and Chris Rumford looked at the concepts of globalization, accelerated and interconnected cross-border boundaries, particularly in terms of the world's emphasis on multinational and transnational processes. 공Most of the world's most populous countries have become a democracy in the world, and the United States has grown into a number of wars in which the western culture has grown geopolitical in its highest position. However, they stressed that globalization is no longer the center of Western civilization.Global communications and public culture and political worlds no longer remain in a single country without borders. Also, there is no border between nations and globalization. .
The most talked about in this book is political globalization. National power has led to the decline of the national power and created a different kind of politics along with the development of multinational networks. Or de-territorialization and re-territorialization. Allied countries like the EU.
For some, the process of political globalization opens up the possibility of new liberation while the globalization of another country leads to the loss of autonomy and division of the social world. As EU law is becoming more and more common in Europe, it seems that the World Court has power over many countries.
The globalization approach in this book emphasizes the diversity of globalization.
This is not a new kind of reality but a relational dynamics.
We argue that political globalization has three processes that interact to solve the complex aspects of world politics. .1. A nation-state that is a tool for politics.,
2. Global normative culture for global development and global norms of personality, 3. It is a multi-axis network for the development of global civil society. Political globalization has created a new tension in which politics is now constituted. The previous conflicts revolved around divisions of class division, national versus civil society, tradition and industrial division. But now, political globalization leads to governance, identity, mobility, and local communities.
Interesting point
The most interesting part is that the country is created by globalization in the book. The country here is a country that is invisible. For example, it is an invisible country created by the needs of each other by globalization, such as the European Union, the IMF, WTO, and the United Nations. Such a union is not a country by themselves. But like a nation, especially the European Union, it has its own laws and governs the entire European countries. After all, the countries in Europe have become more powerful and more powerful than the laws of each nation. Also, now the international court of justice is more influential in each country,
In addition to the country that can see, It is the independence of Catalonia which is the most attention now. As an Asian, I am not accustomed to demanding separation from the country. So, geographically, I can’t understand deterritorialization, and reterritorialization in the book, I understood it as a separatist independence of Catalonia. Once upon a time, it was natural to say that under the name of nationalism, it should be concatenated and subordinate. However, the world began to demand independence as the world became increasingly democratized and globalized. In Europe, there are 16 provinces in Europe, including the Basque, Corsica, and others. I still believe that there would be no such autonomous or separatist demand unless the concept of nationalism was widespread and the perceptions of people in the region wanting to be independent. so I realized the significance of the political globalization once again.
Discussion
The author said that even an invisible international organization is one nation.
I thought there was a problem to discuss here.
Are these international organizations just and equitable? Of course there is a good side. I think it is right for these international organizations to do powerful retaliation against countries that threaten the whole world with nuclear weapons like North Korea.
However, on the other hand, I thought that the invisible country was a device for strong people only.
It would be good if political globalization was to cooperate and unite for the same ideology. However, there will surely be a country where the conditions of each country are different and different ideologies of the present age are different. But if they do not follow it, it will be sanctioned and retaliated in and out of the country,
Is that fair enough? Moreover, I think that the power of the international organization is greater than the autonomy of each country, and it is practically the same as putting the developing world into colonies. It's a matter of thinking again.
No comments:
Post a Comment