Saturday, December 9, 2017

W14 Economic Globalization/ KIM TAE YOON


1. Summary
 a) The story and geographical distribution of transnational corporations.
          The development of companies, located in outside of mother country, was part and parcel of early growth of an global economy. A super big scale business empire is created by colonial and merchant capitalists. A firm has the authority to control operations in many countries, even if it does not have the company. This operations stand for about one-tenth of total world gross domestic product and generate one-third of total world exports. It is called global corporations, the ‘placeless’ giants whose operations span the globe and which owe no allegiance to any specific country or community. The common of this company is that they can influence different political, social, and cultural environments.
          Invested by one firm with another intention of gaining control over that firm’s operations, we call ‘Direct investment’. Direct investment that take place across national boundaries, we call this ‘Forign direct investment’. It is a different meaning from ‘portfolio’ investment, which is the situation that firms buy equity in other companies purely for financial reasons and not to have control. So we can say that developing countries is growing very fast and it is beyond question.

          Why (and how) firms ‘transnationalize’

          Motivations
There are number of reasons that business firms extend their operations outside their mother countries. It can be devided into two categories; market oriented investment and asset-oriented investment.

          Market oriented investment
          The reason is simple. When the firms reached a saturation point in its domestic market, they go abroad to search more opportunities.

          Asset oriented investment
          The geographical unevenness of markets is the major set of reasons that firms engage in transnational investment. Firms in the natural resource industries must locate the source of supply. Even if it is often the case that following processing of the resource occurs elsewhere, mostly close to the market. labor that was the primary attraction for firms in certain industries. Also, Firms are go abroad to looking for well educated and highly skilled workers. Most of them are located in East-Asia and East-Europe, transnational investments easily disregard the geographical factors.
          Modes
          There are two major ways that firms develop transnational activities. One is ‘greenfield’ investment, and the other is strategic collaboration. Greenfield investment is building new facilities including administrative office, factory, R&D facility, sales and distribution center and so on. It adds to the productive stock of both the firm itself and the country/community. Greenfield investment is totally different meaning of everseas expansion. It is building a totally new facility.
Strategic collaboration is getting economic power by merger and acquisition. For example, Vodafone’s acquisition of the US company AirTouch Communications for $60.3 billion, Daimler-Benz’s acquisition of Chrysler, Wal- Mart’s acquisition of Asda and Renault’s purchase of a controlling share in Nissan.
Advocates of strategic alliances says that cooperating can combine their capabilities in mutually beneficial ways. On the other hand, critics argue that they should worry about the potential risk of losing key technologies to competitors.

Geography matters: The embeddedness of transnational corporations.
In this part, they are explaining about the difference between western companies and east Asian companies. Considering global economy, place and geography still matter fundamentally in the ways that firms are produced and in how they behave. Most globalizers say vision of the firm is ‘placeless’ corporation.
The domestic structures that a firm initially develops leave a permanent impress on its strategic behavior. East Asian firms tend to establish direct manufacturing operations while American and European firms usually operate by networks of local agents and traders. Societies usually develop unusual ways of organizing their economies, even within the broad, apparently unitary, ideology of capitalism.

 ‘Webs of enterprise’: Transnational production networks.
All business firms are made up with networks of production, distribution and consumption. Networks have become increasingly extensive geographically and controlled by transnational corporations. Therefore general firms can best be considered as ‘a dense network at the center of a web of relationships’.
There is the question that TNC’s organizational architecture that is the related, though not identical, issue of the geographical coordination of its activities. When such patterns show huge variation between different types of TNC or different industries, the internal division of labour is expressed in a distinctive external division of labour.
Transnational firms are exist in many ways. The network Is hard to recognized because the process is like a spider web. TNCs may powerful but they do not have absolute power.  



2. Interesting point
Since I majored in journalism and mass communication, all the economic matters feel apart from me. However, through this assignment, I learned about transnational companies. I was very impressed about its ‘spider web business model’. Currently, I am working for a music company and it has a similar structure. Until a singer makes his or her way up to the stage, many companies bring their heads together to make the best profit. we collaborated with CJ entertainment to make a better outcome. Also, after reading this article, I understand why LG is trying to make a plant in US and South American countries. These ‘placeless’ companies interconnects the world due to its very nature.

3. Discussion point
Due to a risky business model, like a spider web business model, unrelated company results in bankruptcy. So, we could think about “who is to blame for?”  

These multilateral business models have been expanding for the last few decades. For example, Hyundai has been expanding its business in many different countries. As these kinds of multilateral business companies are getting bigger, we could consider of its influence on many areas such as political, social, and economic issues. I would like to discuss these in the class and hear what students think about this topic.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Extra Posting 2 / Jae woong KIM

Q1. How could we measure cultural globalization?     Each country has its own culture and the degree to which the world's peop...