Globalization means space and time that crosses multidimensional, accelerated, interconnected borders. In particular, this text implies an approach to society that emphasizes the transnational process of de-nationalism. Political globalization can be understood as a tension between geopolitics, world norm culture, and a multi-centric network. One of the most common forms of political globalization is the worldwide spread of democracy based on the parliamentary state system. It is one of the types of globalization based on territory and is limited to the political form of the nation state. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union since 1991 and the end of the European Communist regime, democracy has been universally accepted. This democracy became the basis of the 'New World Order', which is related to the US global hegemony and the legalization of world wars. This is the geopolitics of world power.
The second is the emergence of world normative culture. It is distributed to legitimate and global political communication. It is also called 'human rights' and includes global environmental issues. The current world normative culture provides normative reference points for the state and directions for politicians. The third is a pluralistic network. It is a form of non-national politics that originates from multiple sites and can not be reduced to a single center. The process of political globalization is related to networks, flows, new mobility and sources of communication, and represents new relationships between individuals, countries and society. This is related to a new form of global governance.
Sovereignty does not lead to the loss of autonomy. The transnationalization of European countries is not the creation of a new national system that challenges the nation state, but regulatory domination. Drug addiction, vocational training, racism, and aviation safety. These functions are simply carried out at the transnational level through cooperation with other countries. The national state does not disappear, but it transforms itself as the functional component of the transnational organization and the main agent of world capitalism. In other words, globalization makes it impossible to reestablish the state surrounding global capitalism and to make the state independent. It is a change of state rather than the end. It is clear that the state is changing in response to globalization. Each country has the flexibility to cope with globalization more than the country, and globalization has affected the enormous pressure on the nation state, the relationship between the political community and legitimate violence. The transnational integration of the state in the European Union countries undermines the national state and leads to the emergence of a new nationalist movement. Here the state is partly transnational, and the nations abandoned by the state take on new forms and can often be improved by globalization. For example, in 2005 the French voters rejected the European Constitution. In other words, another dimension to the global change of the nation state is the rise of transnational politics.
The state is based on a centralized communication system, such as replicated and justified pop culture. While global disputes over public domain issues continue to be transnational spaces, more importantly, global public discourse emerges rather than a spatially defined reality rather than a representation of discourse. Today it is the domain of discourse that contextualizes political communication and popular discourse. The role of the public in this field is affirmed by the importance attached to the public domain and having an international dimension. Here, the global public has great resonance in all communications in the sense that it constitutes and contextualizes public discourse such as human rights, environment, and health. In terms of the three conceptualizations of globalization, it can be suggested that the world normative culture plays a leading role in forming political communication.
Global civil society aims to solve the contradictory tendencies that have become central to the experience of globalization. The first is the relationship between homogeneity of globalization and emphasis and respect for difference. Second, it is a contradiction within the individual power of globalization represented by the new global community, network politics, and collective identity. Globalization of civil society also follows patterns such as democracy, nationality and citizenship. Globalization has made territorial norms and practices universalized. In this process, as the transnational connectivity of social activists and networks increased, efforts were made to remove borders from civil society activities. The territory here is based on a political virtual world.
In the end, political rebalancing as a result of globalization makes a great reevaluation of the role and meaning of the construction of politics, borders, and space. Democracy is an important member of the world community of the nation state.
It was interesting that the supranationalism of European countries could be called regulatory domination, not the creation of a new national system to challenge the nation-state. In fact, it was thought that the emergence of a European state was the creation of a national system. Reading the text shows that regulation in the European Union is one of the dominant parts of society, I was interested in.
Can globalization impose a duty on democracy to 'globalization'? Also, how should opposition to the transnational forms of democratic states in transnational domination be accepted in globalization?
No comments:
Post a Comment